• Main News
  • About Us
  • Contact
Premium Times Opinion
Wednesday, August 10, 2022
  • Home
  • Democracy and Governance
    • Bámidélé Upfront
    • Jibrin Ibrahim
    • Okey Ndibe
  • Economy
    • Ifeanyi Uddin
  • Issues of the Day
    • Adeolu Ademoyo
    • Aribisala on Tuesday
    • Dele Agekameh
    • Pius Adesanmi
  • Politics
    • Ebeneezer Obadare
    • Femi Fani-Kayode
    • Garba Shehu
    • Hannatu Musawa
    • Zainab Suleiman Okino
  • Guest Columns
  • Faith
    • Article of Faith
    • Sunday Ogidigbo
    • Friday Sermon
    • Elevated Sight
  • Home
  • Democracy and Governance
    • Bámidélé Upfront
    • Jibrin Ibrahim
    • Okey Ndibe
  • Economy
    • Ifeanyi Uddin
  • Issues of the Day
    • Adeolu Ademoyo
    • Aribisala on Tuesday
    • Dele Agekameh
    • Pius Adesanmi
  • Politics
    • Ebeneezer Obadare
    • Femi Fani-Kayode
    • Garba Shehu
    • Hannatu Musawa
    • Zainab Suleiman Okino
  • Guest Columns
  • Faith
    • Article of Faith
    • Sunday Ogidigbo
    • Friday Sermon
    • Elevated Sight
No Result
View All Result
Premium Times Opinion
Home Opinion

Need for President Jonathan to reconsider stance on Nigerian constitution, By Femi Falana

by Premium Times
April 19, 2015
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0

To the utter embarrassment of the members of the National Assembly, President Jonathan decided to withhold his assent to 4th amendment to the Constitution. In his comprehensive letter addressed to both chambers of the National Assembly last week, the outgoing President challenged the procedure and the substance of the proposed alteration of the Constitution. Having regard to the enormous resources invested in the constitutional review, the President ought to have convened a meeting with the leadership of the National Assembly with a view to ironing out the grey areas. No doubt, the National Assembly members have themselves to blame for engaging in the instalmental amendments of a Constitution imposed on the Nigerian people by military dictators.

In view of the clear provisions of the Constitution on separation of powers the National Assembly acted illegally and unconstitutionally when it conferred the National Economic Council, an advisory body, with the power to appoint the Accountant-General of the Federal Government. As if that was not enough, the National Assembly wants the National Judicial Council, NJC, to appoint the Attorney-General of the federal government. The legislators ought to have known that the NJC is only empowered to recommend to the appointing authorities (President and state governors) suitable persons for appointment as judges and recommend their removal from the bench. Having taken away the powers of the President, the National Assembly decided to increase its own powers. As far as the legislators are concerned, an amendment of the Constitution will no longer require the assent of the President. Such self serving amendments were rightly rejected by the President.

However, the President goofed on the procedure for altering the provisions of the Constitution. The President’s view that an amendment of the Constitution requires the votes of four fifths of the National Assembly and approved by the resolution of the Houses of Assembly of not less than two-thirds of all the States is patently wrong. The stringent requirement of section 9(3) of the Constitution is only applicable to the alteration of section 8 (on state creation), section 9 (on Constitutional amendment) or chapter four (on fundamental rights) thereof. In other words, the alteration of any of the other provisions of the Constitution requires the resolution of two-thirds majority of the National Assembly and the Houses of Assembly of all the States of the Federation. It is on record that the last three alterations of the Constitution were passed by the two-thirds majority of the federal and state legislators and signed into law by President Jonathan in 2010 and 2011.

Notwithstanding the approach adopted by the President in rejecting the proposed alteration, the members of the National Assembly should refrain from exhibiting arrogance of power in the circumstance. The letter calls for a sober examination of the reasons adduced by the President for rejecting the controversial amendments. More so, that some of the amendments are patently illegal and unconstitutional. For instance, one of the most objectionable propositions in the 4th amendment which was not even captured in the President’s letter is the provision of the scandalous pension for life for former leaders of the National Assembly. If the amendment had been signed into law by the President, some of the beneficiaries who are in their 40s would have been entitled to earn pension for the rest of their lives for rendering part time legislative service for less than four years. Not unexpectedly, the amendment is silent on the jumbo emoluments of the members of the National Assembly which Nigerians have consistently rejected since 1999.

Since the President rejected the amendments based on the erroneous belief that the requisite constitutional requirement was not met he ought to withdraw the letter addressed to the National Assembly and review his position on the constitutional amendment. During the campaign, President Jonathan did promise to implement the recommendations of the 2014 national conference. In fact, the federal executive council has since passed a resolution for the immediate implementation of the resolutions of the confab. One of the most important recommendations is that chapter two of the Constitution on the fundamental objectives and directive principles of state policy be made justiciable. Since that recommendation and a few others are in tandem with the proposed amendment of the Constitution, President Jonathan ought to have endorsed the relevant provisions.

In rejecting the proposed amendment that every child be entitled to free education the President said that there was no dichotomy between public and private schools. The attention of the President ought to have been drawn to section 15,of the Child’s Rights Act, 2003 and section 2 of the Compulsory, Universal, Free Basic Education Act, 2004 which have made education free and compulsory from primary to junior secondary school for every Nigerian child. Before rejecting the amendment on the right to basic health care the President ought to have been reminded that the National Health Bill 2014, signed into law by him in November last year has directed the federal government to fund basic health care with not less than one per cent of the consolidated revenue of the federal government. Since the amendment has merely enshrined the right to basic education and basic health care in the Constitution, the President ought to have signed that aspect of the proposed amendments in the interest of the poor and vulnerable segment of the country.

In 2006, the 108 amendments of the Constitution were thrown away with the third term agenda of President Olusegun Obasanjo. If care is not taken, the over 70 proposed amendments proposed by the legislators may suffer the same fate. Therefore, President Jonathan should be advised to convene an urgent meeting of all the stake holders with a view to removing the controversial clauses from the proposed amendment. Once that is done the National Assembly should pass the bill and send it back to the President for his assent. Instead of throwing out the baby with the bath- water the provisions of the 4th amendment to the Constitution should be supported to the extent that it has recognized the right of the Nigerian people to enforce their socio-economic rights enshrined in chapter two of the Constitution.

Femi Falana is a Senior Advocate of Nigeria.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr

Related

Previous Post

Nigeria’s problems not solved by just voting Buhari, By Abiola Adebanjo

Next Post

Chibok Girls and State Reconstruction in Nigeria, By Jibrin Ibrahim

Related Posts

Zamfara Gold As Commonwealth, By Zailani Bappa
Opinion

Sheikh Gumi, Governor Matawalle and the Sands of Time, By Zailani Bappa

February 2, 2021
June 12 As Democracy Day Needs To Be Reconsidered, By Bashir Tofa
Opinion

The Need To Act Now To Stop the Ethnic Conflagration!, By Bashir Othman Tofa

February 2, 2021
Kofi Annan: In Service of the World, By Ejeviome Eloho Otobo & Oseloka H. Obaze
Opinion

Biden’s Likely Policy Orientation Toward Africa, By Ejeviome E. Otobo and Oseloka H. Obaze

February 2, 2021
Agenda for ‘Born Again’ JAMB and TETFUND, By Tunde Musibau Akanni
Opinion

Oyeweso, A Celebrated Historian, Ascends the Sixth Floor, By Tunde Akanni

February 2, 2021
Before Nigeria Burns, By Akin Fadeyi
Opinion

Is President Buhari Presiding Over the Last United Nigeria?, By Akin Fadeyi

February 2, 2021
On A Soyinka Prize In ‘Illiteracy’, By Biko Agozino
Opinion

Obasanjo: Only Those Who Did Not Do Well Went Into the Military, By Biko Agozino

February 1, 2021
Next Post
Sanusi II and the Prospects of Radical Emirship, By Jibrin Ibrahim

Chibok Girls and State Reconstruction in Nigeria, By Jibrin Ibrahim

A New Low, By Uddin Ifeanyi

The CBN and Market Tools, By Uddin Ifeanyi

Editorial

  • EDITORIAL: The Urgency of Tackling Nigeria’s Second Wave of COVID-19

    EDITORIAL: The Urgency of Tackling Nigeria’s Second Wave of COVID-19

  • EDITORIAL: Unearthing the Cogent Lessons In the NESG-CBN Economic Policy Imbroglio

    EDITORIAL: Unearthing the Cogent Lessons In the NESG-CBN Economic Policy Imbroglio

  • EDITORIAL: COVID-19: Calling On Nigeria’s Billionaires and Religious Leaders To Step Up

    EDITORIAL: COVID-19: Calling On Nigeria’s Billionaires and Religious Leaders To Step Up

  • EDITORIAL: Bichi Must Go; Buhari Must Halt Slide Into Despotism

    EDITORIAL: Bichi Must Go; Buhari Must Halt Slide Into Despotism

  • EDITORIAL: The Flaws In Governor Emefiele’s Five-Year Plan For Central Bank of Nigeria

    EDITORIAL: The Flaws In Governor Emefiele’s Five-Year Plan For Central Bank of Nigeria

Subscribe to our Opinion articles via email

Enter your email address to get notifications of new opinion articles as they are published.

Join 526,543 other subscribers

Most Popular

  • The Bad Consequences and Dangers of Adultery and Fornication (Zina) In Islam, By Murtadha Gusau
    The Bad Consequences and Dangers of Adultery and Fornication (Zina) In Islam, By Murtadha Gusau
  • Islam and the Conditions For Marrying More Than One Wife, By Murtadha Gusau
    Islam and the Conditions For Marrying More Than One Wife, By Murtadha Gusau
  • The Women Prohibited For Men To Marry In Islam, By Murtadha Gusau
    The Women Prohibited For Men To Marry In Islam, By Murtadha Gusau
  • Revisiting the Corruption Theory of A Departed Journalist, By Banji Ojewale
    Revisiting the Corruption Theory of A Departed Journalist, By Banji Ojewale
  • The Importance Of Keeping Secrets In Islam, By Murtadha Gusau
    The Importance Of Keeping Secrets In Islam, By Murtadha Gusau
  • The Qualities of a Good Leader In Islam, By Murtadha Gusau
    The Qualities of a Good Leader In Islam, By Murtadha Gusau
  • Slaughtering Animal for the New Born Baby (Al-Aqiqah) In Islam, By Murtadha Gusau
    Slaughtering Animal for the New Born Baby (Al-Aqiqah) In Islam, By Murtadha Gusau

Like us on Facebook

Like us on Facebook

Podcasts

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

  • Main News
  • About Us
  • Contact

© 2022 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Democracy and Governance
    • Bámidélé Upfront
    • Jibrin Ibrahim
    • Okey Ndibe
  • Economy
    • Ifeanyi Uddin
  • Issues of the Day
    • Adeolu Ademoyo
    • Aribisala on Tuesday
    • Dele Agekameh
    • Pius Adesanmi
  • Politics
    • Ebeneezer Obadare
    • Femi Fani-Kayode
    • Garba Shehu
    • Hannatu Musawa
    • Zainab Suleiman Okino
  • Guest Columns
  • Faith
    • Article of Faith
    • Sunday Ogidigbo
    • Friday Sermon
    • Elevated Sight

© 2022 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.