• Main News
  • About Us
  • Contact
Premium Times Opinion
Sunday, March 7, 2021
  • Home
  • Democracy and Governance
    • Bámidélé Upfront
    • Jibrin Ibrahim
    • Okey Ndibe
  • Economy
    • Ifeanyi Uddin
  • Issues of the Day
    • Adeolu Ademoyo
    • Aribisala on Tuesday
    • Dele Agekameh
    • Pius Adesanmi
  • Politics
    • Ebeneezer Obadare
    • Femi Fani-Kayode
    • Garba Shehu
    • Hannatu Musawa
    • Zainab Suleiman Okino
  • Guest Columns
  • Faith
    • Article of Faith
    • Sunday Ogidigbo
    • Friday Sermon
    • Elevated Sight
  • Home
  • Democracy and Governance
    • Bámidélé Upfront
    • Jibrin Ibrahim
    • Okey Ndibe
  • Economy
    • Ifeanyi Uddin
  • Issues of the Day
    • Adeolu Ademoyo
    • Aribisala on Tuesday
    • Dele Agekameh
    • Pius Adesanmi
  • Politics
    • Ebeneezer Obadare
    • Femi Fani-Kayode
    • Garba Shehu
    • Hannatu Musawa
    • Zainab Suleiman Okino
  • Guest Columns
  • Faith
    • Article of Faith
    • Sunday Ogidigbo
    • Friday Sermon
    • Elevated Sight
No Result
View All Result
Premium Times Opinion
Home Guest Columns

Freedom of Expression and the Lessons From Singapore’s POFMA, By Kirsten Han

by Premium Times
January 2, 2020
4 min read
0

The powers that a law like POFMA grants the authorities are extensive. In a context where people are already struggling for their civil and political rights, and where a powerful elite can assert dominance over other spaces of public thought and discourse, the impact on freedom of expression and a citizen’s ability to openly engage in democratic practices without fear should not be underestimated.


Even before any bill was presented in Parliament, members of Singapore’s civil society had warned against efforts to tackle “fake news” that would hand over more power to the state without adequate checks and balances. But when we first saw the text of the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) — a piece of legislation that Nigeria is now interested in adopting a version of — our fears were crystallised by the breadth of the powers that would be granted to the government.

Under Singapore’s POFMA, any government minister is allowed to order an individual, organisation, or platform to append government-issued “correction notices” to online posts, or to demand that they remove or block access to such content. These executive orders are considered in effect unless the High Court overturns them, but one can only appeal to the High Court after one has already applied to, and been rejected by, the minister who issued the order. Unless one wins in the High Court at the very end of the process, the order is deemed to be in effect, and a failure to comply to it could attract fines or jail time.

The government is given enormous latitude to determine what “fake news” is. The only criterion that needs to be met for a minister to issue an order is for the content — or aspects of the content — to be considered “false or misleading”, and for the minister to be of the opinion that it’s in the “public interest” to act —a category that extends from national security concerns to the maintenance of public order, to the protection of public confidence in government institutions.

These powers also exist under Nigeria’s proposed Protection from Internet Falsehoods and Manipulation and Other Related Matters Bill, except that it’ll be the Nigerian police force who can exercise them.

When it comes to introducing legislation, questions about proportionality, due process, and checks and balances are important — and Singapore’s POFMA lacks all these things, which means that Nigerians should be extremely cautious about what exactly it is that is being copied over.


That something needs to be done to address harmful misinformation and disinformation circulating freely online, particularly on social media platforms, is not in dispute. It’s already been established that such falsehoods or twisted narratives can have deadly impact, to the point of fuelling Islamophobia and genocide in Myanmar.

But it’s not enough to just agree that we need to address and combat misinformation and disinformation online. How we approach the problem and the measures we take are important too. And the fight against “fake news” can be appropriated and weaponised, used as an excuse by the state to justify further extensions of its power.

When it comes to introducing legislation, questions about proportionality, due process, and checks and balances are important — and Singapore’s POFMA lacks all these things, which means that Nigerians should be extremely cautious about what exactly it is that is being copied over.

POFMA was passed in Singapore’s Parliament in May 2019, about a month after it was introduced for its first reading. It came into effect in early October. Since then, its powers have been invoked five times by various government ministers, against four pieces of online content.

What this essentially means is that the door is open for Singapore’s PAP, or Nigeria’s police force, to target content that’s inconvenient to them; yet, if there ever were any falsehoods or skewed claims coming from these parties, others do not have the same access to the protection that this piece of legislation grants.


Every piece of content, mostly circulated on Facebook, was critical of the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) and its policies. But it wasn’t clear that any of them contained any real risk of incitement to hatred or harm — the sort of serious impact that was seen in Sri Lanka or Myanmar. Instead, the correction directions issued — in which recipients were forced to link to government statements — responded to what the PAP government claimed had been implied (triggering debates among observers about how distinctions between statements of fact and opinion are being made), or quarrelled with the interpretation of data and framing of arguments. The government also made unilateral declarations of intention; in its response to the opposition Singapore Democratic Party, the PAP government said that the party had made false statements with “a singular objective” to “stoke fear and anxiety” among local professionals. This was not a finding of any court trial, but a claim put on record simply because the PAP government said so.

This doesn’t work in reverse; because of the way the law is drafted, it can only be exercised by government ministers (in the Singaporean case) or the police force (in the Nigerian case). No one else can invoke the law to demand a correction or removal of falsehoods.

What this essentially means is that the door is open for Singapore’s PAP, or Nigeria’s police force, to target content that’s inconvenient to them; yet, if there ever were any falsehoods or skewed claims coming from these parties, others do not have the same access to the protection that this piece of legislation grants. It’s not hard to recognise what a problematic state of affairs this is, and how vulnerable it is to abuse.

The powers that a law like POFMA grants the authorities are extensive. In a context where people are already struggling for their civil and political rights, and where a powerful elite can assert dominance over other spaces of public thought and discourse, the impact on freedom of expression and a citizen’s ability to openly engage in democratic practices without fear should not be underestimated.

Kirsten Han is a Singaporean independent journalist and Editor-in-Chief of New Naratif, a platform for Southeast Asian journalism, research, art, and community-building.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Print
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr

Related

Previous Post

A Diaspora Interventionist Model For Knowledge Production In Africa, By Bámidélé Adémólá-Olátéjú

Next Post

The Oshiomhole Saga and APC Survival, By Zainab Suleiman Okino

Related Posts

Zamfara Gold As Commonwealth, By Zailani Bappa
Opinion

Sheikh Gumi, Governor Matawalle and the Sands of Time, By Zailani Bappa

February 2, 2021
June 12 As Democracy Day Needs To Be Reconsidered, By Bashir Tofa
Opinion

The Need To Act Now To Stop the Ethnic Conflagration!, By Bashir Othman Tofa

February 2, 2021
Kofi Annan: In Service of the World, By Ejeviome Eloho Otobo & Oseloka H. Obaze
Opinion

Biden’s Likely Policy Orientation Toward Africa, By Ejeviome E. Otobo and Oseloka H. Obaze

February 2, 2021
Agenda for ‘Born Again’ JAMB and TETFUND, By Tunde Musibau Akanni
Opinion

Oyeweso, A Celebrated Historian, Ascends the Sixth Floor, By Tunde Akanni

February 2, 2021
Before Nigeria Burns, By Akin Fadeyi
Opinion

Is President Buhari Presiding Over the Last United Nigeria?, By Akin Fadeyi

February 2, 2021
On A Soyinka Prize In ‘Illiteracy’, By Biko Agozino
Opinion

Obasanjo: Only Those Who Did Not Do Well Went Into the Military, By Biko Agozino

February 1, 2021
Next Post

The Oshiomhole Saga and APC Survival, By Zainab Suleiman Okino

Defections As Signposting Nigeria’s Political Evolution, By Udeme Nana

December Is Due for a Name Change, By Udeme Nana

Editorial

  • EDITORIAL: The Urgency of Tackling Nigeria’s Second Wave of COVID-19

    EDITORIAL: The Urgency of Tackling Nigeria’s Second Wave of COVID-19

  • EDITORIAL: Unearthing the Cogent Lessons In the NESG-CBN Economic Policy Imbroglio

    EDITORIAL: Unearthing the Cogent Lessons In the NESG-CBN Economic Policy Imbroglio

  • EDITORIAL: COVID-19: Calling On Nigeria’s Billionaires and Religious Leaders To Step Up

    EDITORIAL: COVID-19: Calling On Nigeria’s Billionaires and Religious Leaders To Step Up

  • EDITORIAL: Bichi Must Go; Buhari Must Halt Slide Into Despotism

    EDITORIAL: Bichi Must Go; Buhari Must Halt Slide Into Despotism

  • EDITORIAL: The Flaws In Governor Emefiele’s Five-Year Plan For Central Bank of Nigeria

    EDITORIAL: The Flaws In Governor Emefiele’s Five-Year Plan For Central Bank of Nigeria

Subscribe to our Opinion articles via email

Enter your email address to get notifications of new opinion articles as they are published.

Join 526,525 other subscribers

Most Popular

  • Nnamdi Kanu and Buhari’s Purported Death: The Facts and Fiction (2), By Nonso Robert Attoh
    Nnamdi Kanu and Buhari’s Purported Death: The Facts and Fiction (2), By Nonso Robert Attoh
  • What is the Nigerian Dream?, By Taiwo Odukoya
    What is the Nigerian Dream?, By Taiwo Odukoya
  • The Bad Consequences and Dangers of Adultery and Fornication (Zina) In Islam, By Murtadha Gusau
    The Bad Consequences and Dangers of Adultery and Fornication (Zina) In Islam, By Murtadha Gusau
  • Islam Doesn't Allow A Husband To Beat Or Slap His Wife, By Murtadha Gusau
    Islam Doesn't Allow A Husband To Beat Or Slap His Wife, By Murtadha Gusau
  • The Qualities of a Good Leader In Islam, By Murtadha Gusau
    The Qualities of a Good Leader In Islam, By Murtadha Gusau
  • Gov. Abiodun’s Largess Amidst Miserable Rewards For Best Students, By Olabisi Deji-Folutile
    Gov. Abiodun’s Largess Amidst Miserable Rewards For Best Students, By Olabisi Deji-Folutile
  • Belu Belu and Bone-Setting: Traditional Medicine to the Rescue, By Bunmi Fatoye-Matory
    Belu Belu and Bone-Setting: Traditional Medicine to the Rescue, By Bunmi Fatoye-Matory

Like us on Facebook

Like us on Facebook

Podcasts

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

  • Main News
  • About Us
  • Contact

© 2021 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Democracy and Governance
    • Bámidélé Upfront
    • Jibrin Ibrahim
    • Okey Ndibe
  • Economy
    • Ifeanyi Uddin
  • Issues of the Day
    • Adeolu Ademoyo
    • Aribisala on Tuesday
    • Dele Agekameh
    • Pius Adesanmi
  • Politics
    • Ebeneezer Obadare
    • Femi Fani-Kayode
    • Garba Shehu
    • Hannatu Musawa
    • Zainab Suleiman Okino
  • Guest Columns
  • Faith
    • Article of Faith
    • Sunday Ogidigbo
    • Friday Sermon
    • Elevated Sight

© 2021 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.